Fiction, and facts

So it's not old news that divorce rates have been rising since the late 60's, where it rose from .2% and by 7.1% in the late 90's, and is now at 50%! What are the causes, Can it be changed? Is love really unconditional, or is it fiction? I am accepting the challenge of exploring these questions and more threw articles, psychology, art, and societal opinions.

"I swore I'd never fall again
but this doesn't even feel like falling
gravity can't forget
to pull me back to the ground again"
-halo, beyonce.

"I thought I had it all figured out, I did
I thought I was tough enough to stick it out with Kim
but I wasn't tough enough to juggle the two things at one
I found myself laying on my knees in cuffs
which shoulda been a reason for me get my stuff and just leave"
-Say goodbye holly wood, Eminem.


What makes women susceptible to "any man is better than no man at all"? Why does it hurt when relationships end for some, and not for others? How does it seem that you are a less likely candidate, and loose to a partner that seems completely wrong? Are the games of chase, and sex wrong? How far does emotion truly influence our relationships?
How is it that the country's that are predominately christian, have the highest divorce rates? And what is the rate for standing relationships in other counrtys who do not validate mirage as a necessity. Are men truly dis-attached from sex? How do paligimst a) not get STD's and b) live 'happily ever after?'

Science has proved that the theories of "sexy" aren't completely social dominate as we take them to be. From our physical appearances to things that make us unique can cause our mate to become attracted to us. So what does this have to say about homo-sexual s? Because there is evidence to support that Homo-sexual people are 50% more likely to have siblings that are, this could support that  their wires are actually running a different path.and that it is not always a 'state of mind' that causes these individuals to become attracted to the same sex. But the better question is, that is there an external factor that is causing these fetuses to develop to this nature?

Liberties that contradict nature's ability to produce off spring has become a rising battle in the US. Do these individuals actually have 'rights' to raise a family? And can we force them to under go treatment, like we do achoholics and druggies to 'correct' their problems? Well, that's like saying only those who have the highest 'IQ' are allowed to work; not a single one of us had properly functioning motor systems. There are those among us who are fantastic at book work, and those who perform better physically. But we don't necessarily discriminate against  their ability's to perform with in society, rather we hold them to an expectation that will better their abilities. 

Just like we all have different strengths with in our motor systems, we all have immanent social strengths. As a child we have what is known as attachment styles: -secure -avoidance -ambient -& disorganized. It is important to remember that while we cannot predicate a superior motor ability, the same is with our social strengths. But this does not fall away from our ability to recognized their explicit representational consequences. Consequences that can be desired, or feared based on what we perceive the produced effect will be. 

The problem with love is that there's allot more factors that contribute to the ever lasting desire for commitment. It's more than just a fixated ability to satisfy lust, and the ambulant interpretation of emotion.